You are not logged in ( login / register )
 
Current conditions
Fair
Complete forecast sponsored by

Counting the cost of contraceptives

Hormonal birth control has its benefits but can come with serious risks

It seemed like something of a miracle pill.

Not only would Yaz prevent pregnancy, it would treat symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder - a dramatic form of premenstrual syndrome - according to its commercials. The oral contraceptive manufactured by Bayer quickly became popular.

Then, last October, came a citation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that Bayer had been deceptive in its advertising, overstating the benefits of Yaz while distracting viewers from its risks - including a risk of blood clots, which Yaz is 6.3 times more likely to cause than other birth-control pills, according to an article posted last month on InjuryBoard.com that also mentions lawsuits that have been brought against Bayer on behalf of women who suffered heart attacks, strokes, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, gallbladder disease or sudden death while on Yaz.

This isn't to say hormonal contraceptives commonly cause such serious side effects. But the FDA's citation of Yaz commercials has caused concern for some women, says Dr. Lisa Brennaman, an obstetrician/gynecologist with Heartland Women's Health.

"Unfortunately, many young women are in need of contraception, and none are completely without risks," she adds, also noting that when faced with the dilemma of taking these risks or risking an unwanted pregnancy, women often opt for the former. "It really comes down to choosing contraception with the fewest possible side effects."

But how should women go about this, and how concerned should they be, really, about risks posed by hormonal contraceptives?

Dr. Brennaman says she helps women choose a method of birth control by asking questions such as how important it is to them to prevent pregnancy, whether they're married and/or monogamous, what their expectations are of their future fertility and whether they have any habits or conditions that could increase their chances of being adversely affected by a birth-control pill. One such habit is smoking, she says, which increases a woman's chance of suffering deep vein thrombosis, heart attack or stroke while on contraception.

But for healthy women, she adds, "I don't think contraception is something they should feel afraid of. Birth-control pills have gotten safer over time."

Something that's made them safer is the fact that today's pills contain low doses of estrogen and progestin compared to the first generation of birth-control pills, created in the 1960s, which studies have linked to an increased risk of breast cancer.

But despite being safer today, estrogen-progestin contraceptives still are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization, as carcinogens. According to the National Cancer Institute, they can increase a woman's risk of developing breast or cervical cancer, even as they decrease her risk of developing endometrial or ovarian cancer. And if a young woman is diagnosed with breast cancer, she's advised to stop taking birth-control pills, because some tumors grow when exposed to estrogen and progestin, says Kristen Thatcher, a registered nurse with Heartland's breast center.

Still, many researchers and doctors don't consider the possibility of a link between birth control and cancer to be significant in comparison to the benefits birth control provides - and many women don't think about the risk at all, simply because those young enough to need contraception aren't old enough to be in the age group most affected by cancer, Dr. Brennaman says.

But some women are concerned about the risks and are seeking alternatives to hormonal contraceptives. Marla Daugherty of St. Joseph, who works as a practitioner with FertilityCare Center of Kansas City and teaches women to chart their cycles as a means to naturally avoid or achieve pregnancy, says she's had a few women in her classes who chose this form of birth control because they're "more health-conscious, more into green, natural approaches." "Plus, those health risks listed in commercials - strokes, heart attacks, certain cancers - those are not small risks," she adds. "Even though they don't affect 100 percent of women, for those women who are affected, they're 100 percent affected."

Lifestyles reporter Erin Wisdom can be reached at ewisdom@npgco.com.

Share Your Thoughts

Comments are the responsibility of the person posting them. Comments will be removed if they: threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin religion or disability; ... 

 ... contain abusive, vulgar or sexually oriented language; spread rumors or lies; or are written in all caps. Please stay on topic. Brief quotes are OK as long as the source is given. Comments must be 250 words or fewer. Newspressnow.com moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.

 

newman says...

At last the truth is starting to come out. The greatest disgrace in health care today is the treatment of human fertility as a disease and there is no better illustration of the depths to which the medical establishment has sunk than their ongoing avocation of hormonal contraceptives.

First you have the clinical implications, which this article still tries to sugarcoat. The most striking is the clear connection between hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer. Just two studies among many have found that 1) breast cancer rates have increased 40% with widespread use of contraceptives, particularly among young women 2)women under 45 who took birth control pills for four or more years before a full-term pregnancy have a 72% increase in breast cancer risk.

You also can't ignore the destruction contraception has had upon our culture through the enabling of the sexual revolution. STD rates are now off the chart while divorce and infidelity are rampant in our society today due to the seperation between sex and procreation that contraception enables.

Lastly is the sad fact that hormonal contraception, contrary to the propaganda of libertines, is the direct cause of abortion. Millions of our fellow human beings have been chemically aborted through hormonal contraception being a abortifacient.

The reality is that the hormonal contraception industry is a multi-billion industry that reaps it's enormous profits at the cost of women and their unborn children's health and lives. We can only hope that most physicians will at long last put the health of their patients first and stop prescribing hormonal contraceptives.

September 29, 2009 at 8:02 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

CeCe says...

"Lastly is the sad fact that hormonal contraception, contrary to the propaganda of libertines, is the direct cause of abortion. Millions of our fellow human beings have been chemically aborted through hormonal contraception being a abortifacient."

Since the birth control this article about prevents the egg from leaving a woman's ovary, thus keeping it from ever being fertilized, this is not possible. Its an urban legend/myth that keeps getting passed around as truth by the super conservative right.

As far as the rest of your post, I'm not even going to touch that with a ten foot pole. Don't feel like starting that particular argument. Just wanted to correct that tidbit since it appears someone has misinformed you as to how hormonal birth control works.

September 29, 2009 at 5:01 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

newman says...

"Urban legend/myth" How about we utilize a standard reference work such as the Physicians' Desk Reference? It and any other medical reference will tell you that birth control pills act in three basic ways:
1. They suppress ovulation, that is, they prevent the woman's body from releasing an egg.
2. They thicken the woman's cervical mucus, which makes it more difficult for sperm to reach the egg.
3. They alter the lining of the uterus so that the zygote (fertilized egg, the first stage in the life of a human being) cannot implant. The developing baby receives his oxygen and nutrition through the uterus, so if the zygote-baby cannot implant, he starves to death. This is, therefore, an abortion.

September 29, 2009 at 7:59 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

jjenn says...

Not everybody is on the pill for that reason. There are a variety of gynocological disorders that can only be allieviated by the pill. I have polycystic ovarian syndrome, something you wouldn't care about, but it can only be helped with the pill. There's no cure other than sterilization and they won't do that until I pop a couple of kids out. So, in order to get some relief from the massive amounts of pain I have to endure on a monthly basis, I take the pill. Besides, I've never really understood why you would care so much. It's not your child, it's not your body, and it won't be on your conscience. I'd much rather somebody be on the pill, than have a child that will grow up with a 17-year-old mom, or a meth-addicted mother, or violent father. At least they're smart enough to know that a baby would be a mistake at this particular moment in time.

October 9, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. ( | suggest removal )